Ireally liked the conversation choices odyssey had, I feel like the choices have an effect on your storyline, origin has none of that. It's just him talking which doesn't hold my attention bc there are no choices that could effect the storyline. I think I should have started with origin then went to odyssey bc that feels like a much better Assassins Creed Valhalla is more focused, albeit a griding game than AC: Odyssey, be it the combat, storyline, or the overall game mechanics. Valhalla combines the best parts from Origins and Odyssey while refining the RPG mechanics and graphics. Given that Valhalla feels lifeless in the initial plays, once you let it grow on you, there is Fora minute there, it sounded like Assassin's Creed Valhalla would actually be smaller that its enormous predecessor Odyssey. Not so, says a Valhalla producer. Surprising no one, it will in fact be larger. Previously on How Big Is It Actually, Ubisoft's head of communications for the Middle East tweeted (and has since deleted) Generally Origins is a more historical and serious game, Odyssey is a more casual sandbox with mythology, and Valhalla is serious and fantasy-y. Origins is the best IMO, but Odyssey is more open with a better core gampley loop. Valhalla is a little janky. So: Probably Odyssey. Valhalla has separate stealth and combat difficulty, but none are 1- Origins 2 - Valhalla 3 - Odyssey I'd pick all 3 of them and play whenever you are able to. What I hated most about Odyssey was the Bounty feature as it was rather annoying after a few hours, and the inventory was a cluttered mess. Skill Tree I liked most in Origins, Abilities were best in Odyssey, Inventory best in Valhalla. Assassins Creed Origins vs Assassin's Creed Odyssey vs Assassin's Creed Valhalla - Which Game is Best?Graphics Comparison Between AC Origins vs 5t5kNQZ. Poll Face-Off: 'AC Origins' vs. 'AC Odyssey' vs. 'AC Valhalla'. A poll by Master_Strange. Assassin's Creed is an open-world action-adventure stealth video game franchise published by Ubisoft. The latest three games, Assassin's Creed Origins, Assassin's Creed Odyssey, and Assassin's Creed Valhalla, followed the story of the assassins in Valhalla Odyssey was a mess and tried to be Witcher 3. It learned nothing from the mistakes of Origins. Valhalla looks better, runs smoother, ALLOWS YOU TO PLAY LIKE AN ASSASSIN and tries to merge the Originsis far better connected to the AC lore. The environment in Origins has more contrast between lush and dry zones, making things stand out better. In Odyssey everything is lush and pretty so it loses specialness at times. In Egypt it's big deserts and then finding an oasis, a city, or the Nile valley. Wow! Odysseylooks much, much better than Valhalla. Yes, technically speaking, there is no context: Valhalla wins. But the environments, towns and cities have a much better design in Odyssey — architecture, colors, lightning, npcs, animals I wonder why you guys even bother trying to find out which one is in 4K. Valhalla's environments are bland HelloFriendsPlease Click on The Like Button if You Loved This VideoAnd Subscribe my ChannelTell Me What I Missed in Comments Below So that I Can Impro Butrebranding Valhalla as a non-AC game wouldn't have changed anything for me. It's still dull as hell due to its repetitive nature. But in between origins and odyssey we are lost once again. They go BACK in time even further going even farther away from the Assassin's vs Templar fight then origins already did and more strange story

ac origins vs odyssey vs valhalla